A professionally written feature
Approximately 1,000–1,500 words explaining the project, its purpose, activities or methods, results or milestones, and significance.
ResearchAdministration.org produces professionally written, researcher-reviewed feature articles about university research projects: what was funded, what the team did, what was learned, and why the work matters.
A polished public-facing article explains the project in language an informed reader can understand, while preserving the context and limitations of the underlying work.
The initial offer is intentionally simple. You provide the project materials. We create a professional article that documents the work and gives your team something clear, permanent, and shareable.
Approximately 1,000–1,500 words explaining the project, its purpose, activities or methods, results or milestones, and significance.
The approved feature is published on ResearchAdministration.org with links to the researcher, university, project, publication, or other approved sources.
You also receive a clean PDF version of the final feature for stakeholders, internal communication, project records, and direct sharing.
A feature does not have to begin with a journal article. It can begin with a funded project, a completed milestone, a program, an event, a released report, or a set of findings.
A publication, report, dataset, prototype, or analysis that gives the project something concrete to explain.
A completed phase, field effort, launch, community program, event, partnership, or other substantive activity.
Projects that matter to partners, practitioners, communities, policymakers, funders, students, or other non-specialist audiences.
Send a publication, report, project page, presentation, approved images, or other material that accurately describes the work.
We identify the essential project context, activities, findings, milestones, limitations, funding acknowledgment, and approved links.
The article is written for an informed non-specialist audience without inventing findings or overstating the work.
Your team reviews the draft, requests one consolidated revision, and approves the final page before it goes live.
The first version is designed for university principal investigators, faculty researchers, laboratories, centers, institutes, and sponsored-project teams with a specific project worth documenting.
No multi-part package to decode. One defined project, one professional feature, one review cycle, and two final formats.
One professionally written public-facing feature about one defined university research project. The final deliverables are a published project page on ResearchAdministration.org and a shareable PDF version of the approved article.
No. A feature can be built around a paper, report, completed milestone, funded program, research event, prototype, field project, or another well-documented research activity.
No. A Research Project Feature is a paid research-communication deliverable. We do not present commissioned features as independent journalistic coverage or peer review.
No. We communicate existing work. We do not manufacture findings, write undisclosed academic manuscripts, or change conclusions to make a project appear more significant.
Potentially, depending on the specific funding source, award terms, institutional policy, budget, and relationship of the service to the funded project. We do not determine allowability for a university. Researchers should confirm the appropriate account with their sponsored-project administrator when necessary.
Tell us before the project begins. The October founding offer is designed around a public feature, but we can determine whether a private or institution-hosted version is a better fit before payment.
Send a short description or project link. We review the fit before payment.
Start a Feature →